Strategic Inheritance - Maximize your legacy.
Home Blog Forums

Now what do I do?

-->

I “can’t believe it”!

I met with L____ (our CPA) today so I could sign all our tax returns. (It’s an annual affair. We have about a dozen legal structures, many of which require separate tax returns.)

Anyway. So we’re talking about “how’s life,” as we usually do. (I enjoy meeting with L____ as a casual friend as well as counselor, and we talk about how things are going several times a year.)

So he asks me: “What do you think of J____’s proposal?”

I grow thoughtful for a minute and then say, “I think, in general, it sounds like a great idea. But Sarita and I are really concerned about his 501(c)(3) proposal. . . .”

“B____ [our estate planning and structures attorney] and I are very much concerned about the 501(c)(3) proposal,” he replied.

(!!!!) “You are?!? . . . J____ said you guys were all behind the plan!”

(!!!!) “We said we couldn’t support it unless we got a private letter ruling* from the IRS.”

(!!!!) “J____ never said anything about a private letter ruling. . . .”

And so it went.

I “can’t believe” it! . . . And here I said of B____ and L____, last week, that, because, apparently, they had not raised any of the issues I had come up with concerning shifting to a 501(c)(3), they must not know enough about the issues. I “couldn’t believe” they hadn’t raised any concerns about the proposal. It’s just not like them. They are usually so sharp. –So to have me coming up with concerns that they didn’t mention: I concluded it could only be because 501(c)(3)s were definitely not their area of competence.

But now to have L____ say they specifically had raised concerns . . . !!!!

Why did J____ not say anything in response to my letter last week in which I basically suggested L____ and B____ must “simply” be (excuse the word!) incompetent . . . ?

I don’t understand this. And I am upset.


* A private letter ruling is an official determination by the IRS concerning a taxpayer’s proposed course of action. I am told they are a pain to acquire; they can take “forever”; but if you have any question about whether your proposed course of action will be frowned upon by the IRS, you probably want to get such a ruling . . . or be prepared to take the IRS to court when they disallow (assuming they will disallow) your proposed action.

Rate this:
3.2

Welcome, visitor!

If you find my posts interesting, I invite you to sign up, at the top of the column to the right, to receive emails whenever I publish a new article.

Be assured I hate spam as much as anyone, I will hold your information in strictest confidence, and, of course, I always include a means for unsubscribing whenever you want.

Thanks for visiting!

Sincerely,

John Holzmann

Related posts


Technorati Tags: , ,
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

RSS feed | Trackback URI

Comments »

No comments yet.

To comment, you must provide a name--a pseudonym is fine!--and email address.
Have your own website or blog? Strategic Inheritance is happy to reward your participation on our site.
  • Enter YourName@YourKeywordPhrase and KeywordLuv will create a link back to the URL you provide and use YourKeywordPhrase as the anchor text. (Wonderful for search engine placement!)
  • We have also set up Lucia's Linky Love) so that, after 3 approved comments, all your links will become DoFollow. Of course, to be approved for DoFollow, your comments must contribute to the discussion!
Name(Required)
[Enter either   YourName   --or--   YourName@YourKeywordPhrase]

E-mail (Required) Never shown publicly.

Your Website or Blog URL (Optional)

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post

52 views