Last August I wrote a brief outline of what one might want to include in a Gifting Criteria Statement.

As I was picking through a pile of papers on my desk on Saturday, I came across the actual document our family has at the moment. I thought you might find it interesting and, possibly, useful–at least as a discussion-starting model for your family’s statement: Read the rest of this entry »

I’ve touched on it before. I have no question I will be writing about it again. This, perhaps more than anything else, is what distinguishes legacy planning from estate planning: the content of what some call the “ethical will,” and others refer to as a person’s “testament” or “legacy letter” or what our second legacy planner called the “family wealth letter of intent.” It’s the device–or collection of devices: written, audio, video, or other–that conveys to members of future generations the special messages the estate plan donor wants them to know and remember, the stories of the people and events that shaped their lives, the special life lessons, the heart of the donor. Read the rest of this entry »

Boy! Was I naive!

Kind of like my thinking with respect to estate planning ten years ago, I thought writing an Investment Policy Statement should be pretty straightforward. All I needed, I thought, was some professional help to give me the right words.

But I’ve discovered that is not the case at all–a discovery that is both frustrating (because it means I have a lot more work to do!) and happy at the same time (because I made the discovery; I haven’t made any more foolish or irrevocable mistakes in this area . . . yet).

Way beyond getting the “right words” on paper, Sarita and I need to answer some very fundamental questions–questions far deeper than the average investment advisor is likely to ask or help us answer. Read the rest of this entry »

Yesterday I posted a proposed draft copy of an IPS (Investment Policy Statement) our legacy planners gave me. I said I didn’t feel comfortable signing the document without further input . . . from our investment advisor himself and, perhaps, one or two other similar advisors.

Today I thought I would share some of the things I wrote to our investment advisor about the document. So here’s the cover letter I sent him: Read the rest of this entry »

Our legacy planners have urged us to create an Investment Policy Statement (IPS) that would enable outside onlookers (like my wife and me and/or our legacy planners, for instance) to say, “Yes, [our investment advisor] is living up to the requirements of our IPS. He or she is investing according to policy.” Or, “No. He has violated this parameter. He needs to come back into line.”

Right now, we have no such statement and, as a result, we can’t really be sure whether and to what extent our investment advisor is pursuing a particular plan or simply “going with the flow” of whatever happens to cross his mind at the moment.

********
Originally, our legacy planners asked our investment advisor to give them copies of his current investment policies for our various accounts.

And our investment advisor objected to what looked like an attempt on their part to “butt in” on his area of expertise. “Why do they need to know about my investment policies? What does that have to do with legacy planning?” he asked.

Part of his concern arose from the fact that our legacy planners work for a firm that, in addition to legacy planning, offers investment advisory services. He was concerned they were “simply” going to attempt to second-guess him and, with 20-20 hindsight, demonstrate what a bad job he has done in the last year in the midst of our rather unprecedentedly awful market performance.

Our legacy planners were able to put that fear to rest. “We are not looking to steal your business. We charge the high fees we do so that we have absolutely no need to sell other services. Our services are completely separate from the ‘other side’ of the company. . . .”

Still, the question remained: “What does an investment policy have to do with legacy planning?” Read the rest of this entry »

I wrote a couple of days ago about how advisors can skew your perspective.

In the content of my post, I tried to make clear that I don’t believe any of our advisors have deliberately attempted to distort our views. But I do believe they have failed, in different ways, to call our attention to salient facts, issues we really should have addressed, actions we should have taken but didn’t. And those failures have only been revealed as a result of subsequent counselor/advisors calling our attention to the oversights in previous counselors’ advice.

Now that our nation is going through a massive economic dislocation, I am seeing that additional problems with various estate and legacy plans are being brought to light. Read the rest of this entry »

My wife and I have seen this in the past. I was “just” floored, yesterday, when we saw once more how different advisors’ perspectives can impact one’s plans . . . for better or worse.

Yesterday, our legacy planners wanted to discuss what they characterized as “wealth planning” “to ensure that there is a legacy to plan.” –Especially in these uncertain and highly volatile times, they noted, we must pay particular attention to our cash and near-cash assets.

That all sounded well and good.

But then it hit me. About halfway through the meeting, I held up my hand. “Hold on a second. I just want to make sure I’m hearing you accurately and fully understanding what you are talking about. Read the rest of this entry »

I stumbled onto a page that promotes a service offered by The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America: The Living Balance Sheet™–what I will call the TLBS. Pretty impressive!

In essence, the TLBS seeks to place all your financial and legacy planning information into one electronic/online repository, a repository that you can securely access anytime, anywhere–”even” by Blackberry/Treo if that is your preference.

What particularly intrigues me is Read the rest of this entry »